However, there also seems to be some consensus in the field that "going dark," which is to say performing an investigation at night with all lights out (except for equipment) is the best way to obtain evidence of a spirit because during the day, a spirit would have to "compete" with the ambient energy of the area. I find this assertion to be paradoxical to the previous statement.
If spirits draw from the surrounding ambient energy, then sun-up-lights-on should provide a spectral smorgasbord. Sunlight and electricity should feed spirits enough to generate some really good EVPs, or hurl tables across banquet halls. Granted, ghosts would have a difficult time forming an apparition given the more intense ambient light. However, it seems that if the spirit was drawing nearby energy, then you'd see a manipulation in the surrounding light--possibly a dimming or an anomalous shadow. Perhaps this lends credence to "shadow people."
In any case, I think that it is safe to say that the theories surrounding relationships between paranormal activity warrant some further insight and research. I would propose spending more time gathering data from sites during the day. This would be particularly helpful for newer, less known investigators, who could investigate cemeteries (and other typically-haunted public places), which are open during the day, but closed at night. If research points to a surge of non-visual activity during day hours, it will lend credibility to the spirit-energy-usage theory, but will slightly refute previous ideologies of going dark.
If the data does not justify that time of higher ambient energy (sun-up-lights-on) leading to increased non-visual spirit activity, then further research needs to be conducted as to why spirits seem to be more active when the sun goes down and the lights go off.
As always, be safe in your investigating.
Matthew Vickers
No comments:
Post a Comment